![]() Two and a half years after Nikki's death, her loss hangs over the Catsouras family. ![]() ![]() 'The people looking at these photos don't have to face this family, and it disconnects them from the victims they're hurting,' says Solove, the author of a book about Web privacy, 'The Future of Reputation.' That mask can cause us to behave in ways we normally wouldn't-fueled by a kind of mob mentality. 'It's like having a mask,' says John Suler, a cyber-psychologist at Rider University. But online, anonymity allows us to go further, without the fear of public judgment. Some are driven by simple curiosity, psychologists say-the same urge that causes passing motorists to gawk at accidents. That's why, legally, anyone can post bloody images of Nikki Catsouras-but it doesn't explain why so many people feel compelled to look. 'We have created a deck that is so stacked against private individuals who want to protect their name and privacy that you don't even have a fighting chance,' says Fertik of Reputation Defender. Even if you do identify them, and they agree to remove the content, it's unlikely the content is contained to that Web site alone. A person could try to sue the individuals who post on a Web site-as the Yale women have done-but in the world of anonymous postings and shared public computers, just finding a person's real name can be next to impossible. As a consequence, victims of a damaged reputation have little legal recourse. In 1996, Congress passed legislation-Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act-that immunizes Web sites from liability for the speech of individuals, under the rationale that companies like AOL shouldn't be responsible for the actions of each user. And two Yale Law School alumnae have spent years going after the perpetrators of nasty gossip about them, posted on a legal-discussion board.īut while libel and slander are regulated by law in the real world, in the cyberworld almost anything goes. ![]() Sites like DontDateHimGirl leak dirty allegations about unsuspecting men. Until it was shuttered last year, a site called Juicy Campus stirred controversy by spreading rumors about college students' alleged sexual escapades. ![]() While the specifics of the Catsouras case are unique, the broader issue-of how current laws seem impotent when faced with the viral spread of malicious Internet content-is becoming a widespread concern. From the magazine issue dated May 4, 2009 ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |